This problem requires analyzing data from three tables: Members
, Visits
, and Purchases
, to categorize members based on their conversion rate. The conversion rate is calculated as (100 * total purchases) / total visits
. The categorization is as follows:
The solution uses SQL to perform these operations efficiently. Let's break down the provided MySQL solution:
SELECT
m.member_id,
name,
CASE
WHEN COUNT(v.visit_id) = 0 THEN 'Bronze'
WHEN 100 * COUNT(charged_amount) / COUNT(v.visit_id) >= 80 THEN 'Diamond'
WHEN 100 * COUNT(charged_amount) / COUNT(v.visit_id) >= 50 THEN 'Gold'
ELSE 'Silver'
END AS category
FROM
Members AS m
LEFT JOIN Visits AS v ON m.member_id = v.member_id
LEFT JOIN Purchases AS p ON v.visit_id = p.visit_id
GROUP BY member_id;
1. Joining the Tables:
LEFT JOIN Visits AS v ON m.member_id = v.member_id
: This joins the Members
table (m
) with the Visits
table (v
) using member_id
. A LEFT JOIN
ensures that all members are included in the result, even if they have no visits.LEFT JOIN Purchases AS p ON v.visit_id = p.visit_id
: This further joins the result with the Purchases
table (p
) using visit_id
. This links visits to their corresponding purchases.2. Aggregation and Calculation:
GROUP BY member_id
: This groups the results by member_id
, so we can aggregate data for each member.COUNT(v.visit_id)
: This counts the number of visits for each member. If a member has no visits, this will be 0.COUNT(charged_amount)
: This counts the number of purchases for each member. Null values are ignored. This effectively counts the number of rows in Purchases
associated with each member.100 * COUNT(charged_amount) / COUNT(v.visit_id)
: This calculates the conversion rate. Note that if COUNT(v.visit_id)
is 0, this will result in division by zero. However the CASE
statement handles this.3. Categorization using CASE:
CASE WHEN COUNT(v.visit_id) = 0 THEN 'Bronze' ... ELSE 'Silver' END AS category
: This CASE
statement assigns the category based on the conversion rate. It first checks for the case of zero visits ('Bronze'), then Diamond, Gold, and finally defaults to Silver. This handles the division by zero issue gracefully.Time Complexity Analysis:
The time complexity of this SQL query is dominated by the JOIN
operations and the GROUP BY
operation. In the worst-case scenario, if all three tables have n
, m
, and k
rows respectively, the joins could take O(nm) and O(mk) time in a nested loop join. However, optimized database systems typically use more efficient join algorithms that can significantly reduce this time. The GROUP BY
operation takes O(n log n) in the worst case using efficient sorting algorithms. The CASE
statement has a constant time complexity because it's just a simple comparison.
Therefore, the overall time complexity is likely to be dominated by the join operations, although the actual performance depends on the database system's optimization strategies, data distribution, and indexes. It's not easily expressible as a simple big O notation.
Space Complexity Analysis:
The space complexity depends on the size of the intermediate results during the join and group by operations. In the worst case, it can be proportional to the size of the largest table, or the combined size of the tables involved, depending on the database's implementation details. It's again not easily described with simple big O notation.