Table: Signups
+----------------+----------+ | Column Name | Type | +----------------+----------+ | user_id | int | | time_stamp | datetime | +----------------+----------+ user_id is the column of unique values for this table. Each row contains information about the signup time for the user with ID user_id.
Table: Confirmations
+----------------+----------+ | Column Name | Type | +----------------+----------+ | user_id | int | | time_stamp | datetime | | action | ENUM | +----------------+----------+ (user_id, time_stamp) is the primary key (combination of columns with unique values) for this table. user_id is a foreign key (reference column) to the Signups table. action is an ENUM (category) of the type ('confirmed', 'timeout') Each row of this table indicates that the user with ID user_id requested a confirmation message at time_stamp and that confirmation message was either confirmed ('confirmed') or expired without confirming ('timeout').
The confirmation rate of a user is the number of 'confirmed'
messages divided by the total number of requested confirmation messages. The confirmation rate of a user that did not request any confirmation messages is 0
. Round the confirmation rate to two decimal places.
Write a solution to find the confirmation rate of each user.
Return the result table in any order.
The result format is in the following example.
Example 1:
Input: Signups table: +---------+---------------------+ | user_id | time_stamp | +---------+---------------------+ | 3 | 2020-03-21 10:16:13 | | 7 | 2020-01-04 13:57:59 | | 2 | 2020-07-29 23:09:44 | | 6 | 2020-12-09 10:39:37 | +---------+---------------------+ Confirmations table: +---------+---------------------+-----------+ | user_id | time_stamp | action | +---------+---------------------+-----------+ | 3 | 2021-01-06 03:30:46 | timeout | | 3 | 2021-07-14 14:00:00 | timeout | | 7 | 2021-06-12 11:57:29 | confirmed | | 7 | 2021-06-13 12:58:28 | confirmed | | 7 | 2021-06-14 13:59:27 | confirmed | | 2 | 2021-01-22 00:00:00 | confirmed | | 2 | 2021-02-28 23:59:59 | timeout | +---------+---------------------+-----------+ Output: +---------+-------------------+ | user_id | confirmation_rate | +---------+-------------------+ | 6 | 0.00 | | 3 | 0.00 | | 7 | 1.00 | | 2 | 0.50 | +---------+-------------------+ Explanation: User 6 did not request any confirmation messages. The confirmation rate is 0. User 3 made 2 requests and both timed out. The confirmation rate is 0. User 7 made 3 requests and all were confirmed. The confirmation rate is 1. User 2 made 2 requests where one was confirmed and the other timed out. The confirmation rate is 1 / 2 = 0.5.
This problem requires calculating the confirmation rate for each user based on data from two tables: Signups
and Confirmations
. The confirmation rate is the ratio of confirmed messages to the total number of confirmation messages for each user. The solution uses SQL to efficiently perform this calculation.
The core idea is to join the Signups
and Confirmations
tables, aggregate the results by user ID, and then compute the confirmation rate. A LEFT JOIN
ensures that all users from Signups
are included, even if they have no entries in Confirmations
. This handles the case where a user has zero confirmation messages, resulting in a confirmation rate of 0.
Steps:
Left Join: Perform a LEFT JOIN
between Signups
and Confirmations
using user_id
as the join key. This ensures that all users from Signups
are included in the result.
Conditional Aggregation: Use SUM(action = 'confirmed')
to count the number of confirmed messages for each user. The expression action = 'confirmed'
evaluates to 1 if true and 0 if false, effectively summing only the confirmed cases. COUNT(*)
or COUNT(1)
counts the total number of confirmation requests for each user.
Handling Zero Divisions: Use IFNULL
to handle cases where a user has no confirmation messages. IFNULL(SUM(action = 'confirmed') / COUNT(1), 0)
replaces potential division by zero errors with 0.
Rounding: Use ROUND(..., 2)
to round the confirmation rate to two decimal places, as specified in the problem description.
Grouping: Use GROUP BY user_id
to group the results by user ID, so the aggregation is done per user.
SELECT
user_id,
ROUND(IFNULL(SUM(action = 'confirmed') / COUNT(1), 0), 2) AS confirmation_rate
FROM
SignUps
LEFT JOIN Confirmations USING (user_id)
GROUP BY 1;
SELECT user_id, ...
: Selects the user_id
and the calculated confirmation rate.ROUND(IFNULL(SUM(action = 'confirmed') / COUNT(1), 0), 2)
: This is the core calculation.
SUM(action = 'confirmed')
: Counts the number of confirmed messages.COUNT(1)
: Counts the total number of confirmation messages (confirmed or timeout)./
: Divides confirmed count by total count to get the rate.IFNULL(..., 0)
: Handles the case where there are no confirmations (division by zero), setting the rate to 0 in such cases.ROUND(..., 2)
: Rounds the result to two decimal places.FROM SignUps LEFT JOIN Confirmations USING (user_id)
: Performs a LEFT JOIN
between the Signups
and Confirmations
tables on the user_id
column.GROUP BY 1
: Groups the results by the first column in the SELECT
statement, which is user_id
.The time complexity of this SQL query is dominated by the LEFT JOIN
and GROUP BY
operations. In general, a JOIN
operation on two tables with m and n rows can have a time complexity of O(mlog(m) + nlog(n)) or even O(mn) in the worst case (depending on the database system and the specific query optimizer used). The GROUP BY
operation has a complexity of O(klog(k)), where k is the number of groups (in this case, the number of unique user IDs). Therefore, the overall time complexity is approximately O(max(mlog(m), nlog(n), k*log(k))). The exact complexity depends heavily on the database system's optimization techniques.
The space complexity is determined by the size of the intermediate result set generated by the join and the grouping. In the worst case, it could be proportional to the number of rows in the joined tables, resulting in a space complexity that's approximately O(m + n).
This SQL solution provides an efficient and concise way to calculate the confirmation rate for each user. The use of LEFT JOIN
, conditional aggregation, and error handling makes it robust and adaptable to different datasets.