The product difference between two pairs (a, b)
and (c, d)
is defined as (a * b) - (c * d)
.
(5, 6)
and (2, 7)
is (5 * 6) - (2 * 7) = 16
.Given an integer array nums
, choose four distinct indices w
, x
, y
, and z
such that the product difference between pairs (nums[w], nums[x])
and (nums[y], nums[z])
is maximized.
Return the maximum such product difference.
Example 1:
Input: nums = [5,6,2,7,4] Output: 34 Explanation: We can choose indices 1 and 3 for the first pair (6, 7) and indices 2 and 4 for the second pair (2, 4). The product difference is (6 * 7) - (2 * 4) = 34.
Example 2:
Input: nums = [4,2,5,9,7,4,8] Output: 64 Explanation: We can choose indices 3 and 6 for the first pair (9, 8) and indices 1 and 5 for the second pair (2, 4). The product difference is (9 * 8) - (2 * 4) = 64.
Constraints:
4 <= nums.length <= 104
1 <= nums[i] <= 104
The problem asks to find the maximum product difference between two pairs of numbers chosen from an input array nums
. The product difference is defined as (a * b) - (c * d)
, where (a, b)
and (c, d)
are the two chosen pairs. To maximize this difference, we need to maximize the product a * b
and minimize the product c * d
.
Approach:
The most efficient way to solve this problem involves sorting the input array. After sorting, the two largest numbers will form the pair that maximizes the product a * b
, and the two smallest numbers will form the pair that minimizes the product c * d
.
Algorithm:
nums
in ascending order.nums[n-1] * nums[n-2] - nums[0] * nums[1]
, where n
is the length of the array. nums[n-1]
and nums[n-2]
are the two largest numbers, and nums[0]
and nums[1]
are the two smallest numbers.Time Complexity Analysis:
The dominant operation is sorting the array. The time complexity of most efficient sorting algorithms (like merge sort or quicksort) is O(n log n), where n is the length of the array. The calculation of the product difference takes constant time, O(1). Therefore, the overall time complexity is O(n log n).
Space Complexity Analysis:
In-place sorting algorithms can be used, leading to a space complexity of O(1) for the sorting step. The space used for storing intermediate variables is constant. Therefore, the overall space complexity is O(1) (or O(n) if you use a sorting method with extra space).
The following code snippets implement the solution described above in various programming languages:
Python:
class Solution:
def maxProductDifference(self, nums: List[int]) -> int:
nums.sort()
return nums[-1] * nums[-2] - nums[0] * nums[1]
Java:
import java.util.Arrays;
class Solution {
public int maxProductDifference(int[] nums) {
Arrays.sort(nums);
int n = nums.length;
return nums[n - 1] * nums[n - 2] - nums[0] * nums[1];
}
}
C++:
#include <algorithm>
#include <vector>
class Solution {
public:
int maxProductDifference(std::vector<int>& nums) {
std::sort(nums.begin(), nums.end());
int n = nums.size();
return nums[n - 1] * nums[n - 2] - nums[0] * nums[1];
}
};
Go:
import "sort"
func maxProductDifference(nums []int) int {
sort.Ints(nums)
n := len(nums)
return nums[n-1]*nums[n-2] - nums[0]*nums[1]
}
JavaScript:
/**
* @param {number[]} nums
* @return {number}
*/
var maxProductDifference = function(nums) {
nums.sort((a, b) => a - b);
let n = nums.length;
return nums[n - 1] * nums[n - 2] - nums[0] * nums[1];
};
All these solutions follow the same basic algorithm: sort the array and then perform a simple calculation to get the maximum product difference. The choice of language affects only the syntax and specific sorting functions used, but the underlying algorithmic approach remains consistent.