You are given an array of non-overlapping intervals intervals
where intervals[i] = [starti, endi]
represent the start and the end of the ith
interval and intervals
is sorted in ascending order by starti
. You are also given an interval newInterval = [start, end]
that represents the start and end of another interval.
Insert newInterval
into intervals
such that intervals
is still sorted in ascending order by starti
and intervals
still does not have any overlapping intervals (merge overlapping intervals if necessary).
Return intervals
after the insertion.
Note that you don't need to modify intervals
in-place. You can make a new array and return it.
Example 1:
Input: intervals = [[1,3],[6,9]], newInterval = [2,5] Output: [[1,5],[6,9]]
Example 2:
Input: intervals = [[1,2],[3,5],[6,7],[8,10],[12,16]], newInterval = [4,8] Output: [[1,2],[3,10],[12,16]] Explanation: Because the new interval [4,8] overlaps with [3,5],[6,7],[8,10].
Constraints:
0 <= intervals.length <= 104
intervals[i].length == 2
0 <= starti <= endi <= 105
intervals
is sorted by starti
in ascending order.newInterval.length == 2
0 <= start <= end <= 105
This problem involves inserting a new interval into a sorted list of non-overlapping intervals and merging overlapping intervals. Two approaches are presented below:
This approach involves three steps:
newInterval
to the intervals
array.intervals
based on the start time of each interval.Time Complexity: O(n log n) due to the sorting step. The merging step is O(n). Space Complexity: O(n) in the worst case, as we may need to create a new array to store the merged intervals. This excludes the space used by the input and output arrays themselves.
This approach offers an optimized solution by performing the insertion and merging in a single pass:
Initialization: Initialize an empty result array ans
and variables to track the newInterval
's start and end. Also, use a boolean flag inserted
to track whether the newInterval
has already been added.
Iteration: Iterate through the input intervals
. For each interval:
newInterval
's end (ed < s
), and the newInterval
hasn't been inserted yet, insert the newInterval
into the ans
. Then add the current interval to ans
.newInterval
's start (e < st
), add the current interval to ans
.newInterval
's start and end to cover the entire range of the merged interval.Final Insertion: After the loop, if the newInterval
hasn't been inserted, append it to ans
.
Time Complexity: O(n) as we iterate through the array only once. Space Complexity: O(n) in the worst case, to store the result. Again, this excludes the input and output arrays.
Approach 1:
def insert(intervals, newInterval):
intervals.append(newInterval)
intervals.sort()
merged = []
for i in intervals:
if not merged or i[0] > merged[-1][1]:
merged.append(i)
else:
merged[-1][1] = max(merged[-1][1], i[1])
return merged
Approach 2:
def insert(intervals, newInterval):
st, ed = newInterval
ans = []
inserted = False
for s, e in intervals:
if ed < s:
if not inserted:
ans.append([st, ed])
inserted = True
ans.append([s, e])
elif e < st:
ans.append([s, e])
else:
st = min(st, s)
ed = max(ed, e)
if not inserted:
ans.append([st, ed])
return ans
The code examples in other languages (Java, C++, Go, TypeScript, Rust, C#) follow similar logic based on the chosen approach. Remember to choose the approach that best suits your needs. For large datasets, the one-pass traversal (Approach 2) provides a significant performance advantage.