This problem requires finding the size of each team an employee belongs to. The solution involves using SQL queries to aggregate data from the Employee
table. Two approaches are presented: one using a common table expression (CTE) and another utilizing a self-join.
This approach first creates a CTE named T
to calculate the team size for each team_id
. It groups the Employee
table by team_id
and counts the number of employees in each team using COUNT(1)
. The result is a table with team_id
and the corresponding team_size
.
Then, it joins the original Employee
table with the T
CTE using team_id
as the join key. This ensures that each employee's record is associated with the team_size
calculated in the CTE. Finally, it selects the employee_id
and team_size
from the joined result.
MySQL Code:
WITH
T AS (
SELECT team_id, COUNT(1) AS team_size
FROM Employee
GROUP BY 1
)
SELECT employee_id, team_size
FROM
Employee
JOIN T USING (team_id);
Time Complexity Analysis:
T
) creation involves a GROUP BY
operation, which has a time complexity of O(N log N) or O(N) depending on the database implementation. N is the number of rows in the Employee
table.JOIN
operation has a time complexity of O(M log M) or O(M), where M is the size of the intermediate table generated by the CTE (which is less than or equal to N).GROUP BY
operation, making the time complexity approximately O(N log N) or O(N) in the best case.This approach employs a LEFT JOIN
operation to join the Employee
table with itself. Both instances of the table (aliased as e1
and e2
) are joined using team_id
. This essentially creates pairs of employees within the same team.
Then, a GROUP BY
clause groups the results by e1.employee_id
, and COUNT(1)
counts the number of employees in each group (team). This gives the team_size
for each employee.
MySQL Code:
SELECT e1.employee_id, COUNT(1) AS team_size
FROM
Employee AS e1
LEFT JOIN Employee AS e2 USING (team_id)
GROUP BY 1;
Time Complexity Analysis:
LEFT JOIN
operation has a similar time complexity to the JOIN
in Approach 1: O(N log N) or O(N).GROUP BY
operation again contributes O(N log N) or O(N) time complexity.Both approaches achieve the same result. The CTE approach might be slightly more readable as it separates the team size calculation from the final join, making the logic clearer. However, the performance difference between the two approaches is usually negligible for reasonably sized datasets. The choice depends largely on personal preference and coding style.