This problem requires analyzing a Calls
table to determine the number of calls and total call duration between each unique pair of individuals. The solution involves grouping and aggregation.
Approach:
The core idea is to:
Normalize the IDs: Since a call can be represented as (from_id, to_id) or (to_id, from_id), we need to consistently represent each call pair. We achieve this by defining person1
as the smaller ID and person2
as the larger ID. This ensures that pairs (1,2) and (2,1) are treated as the same. We can use either IF
statements or the LEAST
and GREATEST
functions in SQL to accomplish this.
Group and Aggregate: After normalizing the IDs, we group the results by person1
and person2
. This allows us to count the number of calls (call_count
) and sum the total duration (total_duration
) for each unique pair.
SQL Solutions:
Two equivalent SQL solutions are presented below using different methods for normalizing the IDs. Both solutions have the same time and space complexity.
Solution 1 (using IF):
SELECT
IF(from_id < to_id, from_id, to_id) AS person1,
IF(from_id < to_id, to_id, from_id) AS person2,
COUNT(*) AS call_count,
SUM(duration) AS total_duration
FROM Calls
GROUP BY person1, person2;
This solution uses IF
statements to assign the smaller ID to person1
and the larger ID to person2
. COUNT(*)
counts the rows in each group, and SUM(duration)
calculates the sum of durations.
Solution 2 (using LEAST and GREATEST):
SELECT
LEAST(from_id, to_id) AS person1,
GREATEST(from_id, to_id) AS person2,
COUNT(*) AS call_count,
SUM(duration) AS total_duration
FROM Calls
GROUP BY person1, person2;
This solution achieves the same result using the built-in LEAST
and GREATEST
functions, which are more concise and often preferred for readability.
Time and Space Complexity:
Time Complexity: O(N log N), where N is the number of rows in the Calls
table. The dominant operation is the GROUP BY
clause, which involves sorting or hashing the rows to group them. The specific time complexity depends on the database engine's implementation of GROUP BY
.
Space Complexity: O(M), where M is the number of unique pairs of (person1, person2). This space is needed to store the intermediate results during the grouping and aggregation process. In the worst case, M could be O(N^2), but this is unlikely unless the data has a very specific pattern. Generally, M will be significantly smaller than N.
Note: The actual execution time and space usage will depend on factors like the database system, the size of the Calls
table, and the available resources (e.g., memory, CPU). The complexity analysis provides an estimate of the scaling behavior as the input size grows.