This problem requires analyzing two tables, Transactions
and Chargebacks
, to generate a summary of monthly transactions for each country. The summary includes the number and total amount of approved transactions and chargebacks.
The solution uses a WITH
clause (Common Table Expression) to create a unified view of transactions and chargebacks. This simplifies the subsequent aggregation.
Unified View (CTE T): A CTE named T
combines data from Transactions
and Chargebacks
. It uses a UNION
to append chargeback information to the transaction data. The chargeback rows are identified by setting the state
to 'chargeback'. Crucially, it joins Transactions
and Chargebacks
based on id
and trans_id
to link chargebacks to their corresponding transactions.
Aggregation: The main SELECT
statement aggregates data from T
. It performs the following:
DATE_FORMAT(trans_date, '%Y-%m') AS month
: Extracts the year and month from the transaction date.SUM(state = 'approved') AS approved_count
: Counts approved transactions (MySQL treats boolean TRUE as 1 and FALSE as 0).SUM(IF(state = 'approved', amount, 0)) AS approved_amount
: Sums the amounts of approved transactions.SUM(state = 'chargeback') AS chargeback_count
: Counts chargebacks.SUM(IF(state = 'chargeback', amount, 0)) AS chargeback_amount
: Sums the amounts of chargebacks.GROUP BY 1, 2
: Groups the results by month and country.HAVING approved_amount OR chargeback_amount
: Filters out rows where both approved and chargeback amounts are zero, as specified in the problem statement.WITH
T AS (
SELECT * FROM Transactions
UNION
SELECT id, country, 'chargeback', amount, c.trans_date
FROM
Transactions AS t
JOIN Chargebacks AS c ON t.id = c.trans_id
)
SELECT
DATE_FORMAT(trans_date, '%Y-%m') AS month,
country,
SUM(state = 'approved') AS approved_count,
SUM(IF(state = 'approved', amount, 0)) AS approved_amount,
SUM(state = 'chargeback') AS chargeback_count,
SUM(IF(state = 'chargeback', amount, 0)) AS chargeback_amount
FROM T
GROUP BY 1, 2
HAVING approved_amount OR chargeback_amount;
The time complexity is dominated by the UNION
operation and the GROUP BY
operation. The UNION
operation has a complexity of O(m+n), where 'm' is the number of rows in Transactions and 'n' is the number of rows in Chargebacks. The GROUP BY
operation has a complexity that depends on the sorting algorithm used, but generally is O(k log k) where k is the number of rows after the UNION. Overall, the time complexity is approximately O(max(m,n) * log(m+n)) , which can be considered close to O(N logN) where N is the total number of rows after joining both tables.
The space complexity is determined by the size of the CTE T
, which is proportional to the total number of rows in the Transactions
and Chargebacks
tables. Therefore, the space complexity is O(m+n).
This solution efficiently combines data from two tables to generate the required summary, with a reasonable time and space complexity given the constraints of the problem.