This problem involves querying two tables, Boxes
and Chests
, to calculate the total number of apples and oranges. The key challenge lies in handling the cases where a box contains a chest (indicated by a non-null chest_id
), requiring us to sum the counts from both the box and the contained chest.
The most efficient approach uses a LEFT JOIN
to combine the Boxes
and Chests
tables. A LEFT JOIN
ensures that all rows from the Boxes
table are included in the result, even if there's no matching chest_id
in the Chests
table. Then, we can use aggregate functions (SUM
) to calculate the total apple and orange counts. The IFNULL
(or equivalent) function handles cases where chest_id
is NULL
, effectively treating missing chest counts as zero.
The time complexity of this solution is dominated by the LEFT JOIN
operation. In the worst case, the join operation could take O(M * N) time, where M is the number of rows in Boxes
and N is the number of rows in Chests
. However, database systems usually optimize joins, and with appropriate indexing, the time complexity would likely be closer to O(M + N) or even better. The subsequent SUM
operations have a linear time complexity, O(M), which is less significant compared to the join.
The space complexity depends on the size of the intermediate result of the LEFT JOIN
operation. In the worst case, if all boxes have matching chests, it could be O(M) where M is the number of rows in Boxes. The space used for the final result (total apple and orange counts) is constant, O(1).
SELECT
SUM(COALESCE(b.apple_count, 0) + COALESCE(c.apple_count, 0)) AS apple_count,
SUM(COALESCE(b.orange_count, 0) + COALESCE(c.orange_count, 0)) AS orange_count
FROM
Boxes b
LEFT JOIN
Chests c ON b.chest_id = c.chest_id;
This MySQL query uses COALESCE
which is equivalent to IFNULL
in this context, to handle NULL
values. It performs a LEFT JOIN
to include all boxes and their corresponding chest data. The SUM
function adds up the apple and orange counts from both tables for each box.
import pandas as pd
def count_apples_and_oranges(boxes: pd.DataFrame, chests: pd.DataFrame) -> pd.DataFrame:
# Perform a left merge to combine box and chest data. fillna(0) handles NULLs.
merged = pd.merge(boxes, chests, on='chest_id', how='left').fillna(0)
# Calculate total apple and orange counts.
total_apples = (merged['apple_count_x'] + merged['apple_count_y']).sum()
total_oranges = (merged['orange_count_x'] + merged['orange_count_y']).sum()
# Return result as a DataFrame
return pd.DataFrame({'apple_count': [total_apples], 'orange_count': [total_oranges]})
The Pandas solution uses pd.merge
to achieve the left join, similar to the SQL query. The .fillna(0)
method efficiently handles missing values. Finally, it calculates the sum of apples and oranges and returns a Pandas DataFrame containing the result.
The Pandas solution has a time complexity similar to the SQL solution, dominated by the merge operation which is typically optimized in Pandas. The space complexity is also similar, proportional to the size of the merged DataFrame.