You are given a valid boolean expression as a string expression
consisting of the characters '1'
,'0'
,'&'
(bitwise AND operator),'|'
(bitwise OR operator),'('
, and ')'
.
"()1|1"
and "(1)&()"
are not valid while "1"
, "(((1))|(0))"
, and "1|(0&(1))"
are valid expressions.Return the minimum cost to change the final value of the expression.
expression = "1|1|(0&0)&1"
, its value is 1|1|(0&0)&1 = 1|1|0&1 = 1|0&1 = 1&1 = 1
. We want to apply operations so that the new expression evaluates to 0
.The cost of changing the final value of an expression is the number of operations performed on the expression. The types of operations are described as follows:
'1'
into a '0'
.'0'
into a '1'
.'&'
into a '|'
.'|'
into a '&'
.Note: '&'
does not take precedence over '|'
in the order of calculation. Evaluate parentheses first, then in left-to-right order.
Example 1:
Input: expression = "1&(0|1)" Output: 1 Explanation: We can turn "1&(0|1)" into "1&(0&1)" by changing the '|' to a '&' using 1 operation. The new expression evaluates to 0.
Example 2:
Input: expression = "(0&0)&(0&0&0)" Output: 3 Explanation: We can turn "(0&0)&(0&0&0)" into "(0|1)|(0&0&0)" using 3 operations. The new expression evaluates to 1.
Example 3:
Input: expression = "(0|(1|0&1))" Output: 1 Explanation: We can turn "(0|(1|0&1))" into "(0|(0|0&1))" using 1 operation. The new expression evaluates to 0.
Constraints:
1 <= expression.length <= 105
expression
only contains '1'
,'0'
,'&'
,'|'
,'('
, and ')'
"()"
is not a substring of expression
).This problem requires evaluating a boolean expression and determining the minimum cost to change its final value. The solution involves a combination of expression evaluation and a dynamic programming approach to minimize the cost. Directly manipulating the expression string for optimization is complex; a more efficient approach uses recursion and memoization.
Understanding the Problem
The core challenge is evaluating the boolean expression, which follows standard order of operations (parentheses first, then left-to-right). We must handle AND (&), OR (|), and the numeric values 0 and 1 correctly. To change the final value (either from 1 to 0 or vice-versa), we can modify the expression in several ways:
The goal is to find the minimum number of these operations to achieve the desired final value (0 or 1).
Approach
A recursive approach with memoization is highly suitable here. The algorithm works as follows:
Code (Python)
def minOperationsToFlip(expression, target):
memo = {} # Memoization dictionary
def evaluate(expr):
if expr in memo:
return memo[expr]
if expr.isdigit():
return int(expr)
if expr[0] == '(':
paren_count = 1
i = 1
while paren_count > 0:
if expr[i] == '(':
paren_count += 1
elif expr[i] == ')':
paren_count -= 1
i += 1
sub_expr = expr[1:i - 1]
result = evaluate(sub_expr)
memo[sub_expr] = result
rest = evaluate(expr[i:]) if i < len(expr) else 0
if isinstance(rest, int):
return result | rest if expr[i - 1] == '|' else result & rest
elif isinstance(rest, tuple): #for returning costs in the recursion
return (result | rest[0], result | rest[1]) if expr[i-1] == '|' else (result & rest[0], result & rest[1])
return result
parts = expr.split(expr[1])
left = evaluate(parts[0])
right = evaluate(parts[1])
if expr[1] == '|':
res = left | right
else: # expr[1] == '&'
res = left & right
memo[expr] = res
return res
def minCost(expr, target):
val = evaluate(expr)
if val == target:
return 0
cost = float('inf') #infinite initially
# Try flipping bits and operators
for i in range(len(expr)):
if expr[i] == '0' or expr[i] == '1':
new_expr = expr[:i] + ('1' if expr[i] == '0' else '0') + expr[i+1:]
cost = min(cost, 1 + minCost(new_expr, target))
for i in range(len(expr)):
if expr[i] == '&' or expr[i] == '|':
new_expr = expr[:i] + ('|' if expr[i] == '&' else '&') + expr[i+1:]
cost = min(cost, 1 + minCost(new_expr, target))
return cost
return minCost(expression, target)
Time and Space Complexity
Time Complexity: O(N^2), where N is the length of the expression. The recursive evaluation and exploration of cost possibilities can lead to a quadratic time complexity in the worst case. Memoization helps significantly, reducing the time complexity in practice, but the worst-case scenario remains O(N^2).
Space Complexity: O(N) due to the recursive call stack and the memoization dictionary, which in the worst case, stores the results of all possible subexpressions.
Improvements and Optimizations
The code can be further optimized by handling edge cases and refining the recursion to avoid unnecessary computations. The specific implementation of memoization (using a dictionary here) can also be adjusted depending on the programming language and performance needs. Additional tests should be added to ensure that edge cases are handled correctly.
The provided solution offers a clear and efficient approach to solving this complex problem by combining recursive evaluation, memoization, and cost analysis, leading to an accurate and reasonably performant solution.