This problem asks to find all possible states of a string after one valid move. A valid move consists of flipping two consecutive '+' characters to '--'.
The most straightforward approach involves iterating through the input string and checking for consecutive '+' characters. If found, we perform the flip, add the resulting string to the list of possible next states, and then revert the flip to continue the search.
Time Complexity: O(n), where n is the length of the input string. We iterate through the string once. While we are creating new strings in the process, the string creation is a linear operation relative to the string length. The nested operations within the loop (modifying and adding strings) are constant time relative to n.
Space Complexity: O(n * k), where n is the length of the input string and k is the number of possible moves. In the worst case (many consecutive '++' pairs), we might create a number of new strings proportional to the number of occurrences of "++" subsequences. Each new string has a length of 'n'. If we only consider the space used by the resultant array of strings, it could be O(k) or O(n) depending on the worst-case scenario of input.
The code below demonstrates the solution in several languages. The core logic remains consistent across all implementations.
Python:
def generatePossibleNextMoves(currentState: str) -> List[str]:
result = []
n = len(currentState)
for i in range(n - 1):
if currentState[i:i+2] == "++":
next_state = list(currentState) # Convert string to list for mutability
next_state[i] = '-'
next_state[i+1] = '-'
result.append("".join(next_state))
return result
Java:
import java.util.*;
class Solution {
public List<String> generatePossibleNextMoves(String currentState) {
List<String> result = new ArrayList<>();
int n = currentState.length();
for (int i = 0; i < n - 1; i++) {
if (currentState.substring(i, i + 2).equals("++")) {
String nextState = currentState.substring(0, i) + "--" + currentState.substring(i + 2);
result.add(nextState);
}
}
return result;
}
}
C++:
#include <string>
#include <vector>
class Solution {
public:
std::vector<std::string> generatePossibleNextMoves(std::string currentState) {
std::vector<std::string> result;
int n = currentState.length();
for (int i = 0; i < n - 1; ++i) {
if (currentState.substr(i, 2) == "++") {
std::string nextState = currentState.substr(0, i) + "--" + currentState.substr(i + 2);
result.push_back(nextState);
}
}
return result;
}
};
JavaScript:
/**
* @param {string} currentState
* @return {string[]}
*/
var generatePossibleNextMoves = function(currentState) {
let result = [];
for (let i = 0; i < currentState.length - 1; i++) {
if (currentState.substring(i, i + 2) === "++") {
let nextState = currentState.substring(0, i) + "--" + currentState.substring(i + 2);
result.push(nextState);
}
}
return result;
};
Go:
func generatePossibleNextMoves(currentState string) []string {
result := []string{}
for i := 0; i < len(currentState)-1; i++ {
if currentState[i:i+2] == "++" {
nextState := currentState[:i] + "--" + currentState[i+2:]
result = append(result, nextState)
}
}
return result
}
These implementations all follow the same basic algorithm, differing only in syntax and specific library functions used for string manipulation. The overall efficiency remains consistent across languages.