Given an integer array nums, return all the triplets [nums[i], nums[j], nums[k]]
such that i != j
, i != k
, and j != k
, and nums[i] + nums[j] + nums[k] == 0
.
Notice that the solution set must not contain duplicate triplets.
Example 1:
Input: nums = [-1,0,1,2,-1,-4] Output: [[-1,-1,2],[-1,0,1]] Explanation: nums[0] + nums[1] + nums[2] = (-1) + 0 + 1 = 0. nums[1] + nums[2] + nums[4] = 0 + 1 + (-1) = 0. nums[0] + nums[3] + nums[4] = (-1) + 2 + (-1) = 0. The distinct triplets are [-1,0,1] and [-1,-1,2]. Notice that the order of the output and the order of the triplets does not matter.
Example 2:
Input: nums = [0,1,1] Output: [] Explanation: The only possible triplet does not sum up to 0.
Example 3:
Input: nums = [0,0,0] Output: [[0,0,0]] Explanation: The only possible triplet sums up to 0.
Constraints:
3 <= nums.length <= 3000
-105 <= nums[i] <= 105
Given an integer array nums
, return all the triplets [nums[i], nums[j], nums[k]]
such that i != j
, i != k
, and j != k
, and nums[i] + nums[j] + nums[k] == 0
.
Notice that the solution set must not contain duplicate triplets.
This solution leverages sorting and the two-pointer technique for an efficient approach.
Algorithm:
Sort the array: Sorting allows us to easily skip duplicate numbers and efficiently manage the two pointers. We sort nums
in ascending order.
Iterate and find triplets: We iterate through the sorted array using a primary index i
. For each nums[i]
:
nums[i]
is positive (since the sum must be 0 and the array is sorted).nums[i]
is the same as the previous element (to avoid duplicate triplets).j
(starting at i + 1
) and k
(starting at the end of the array).x = nums[i] + nums[j] + nums[k]
.x < 0
: Increase j
to include a larger number.x > 0
: Decrease k
to include a smaller number.x == 0
: We found a triplet! Add it to the result ans
. Then, increment j
and decrement k
. We also handle duplicates by skipping consecutive identical elements at j
and k
.Return the result: The ans
array will contain all unique triplets that sum to 0.
Time Complexity: O(n^2), dominated by the nested loops. The sorting step is O(n log n), but it's asymptotically less significant than the nested loops.
Space Complexity: O(log n) in the average case for sorting (depends on the sorting algorithm used), and O(m) in the worst case to store the resulting triplets, where m is the number of triplets found. In most cases, m will be significantly smaller than n.
class Solution:
def threeSum(self, nums: List[int]) -> List[List[int]]:
nums.sort()
n = len(nums)
ans = []
for i in range(n - 2):
if nums[i] > 0:
break # Since array is sorted, no need to continue
if i > 0 and nums[i] == nums[i - 1]:
continue # Skip duplicate nums[i]
j, k = i + 1, n - 1
while j < k:
x = nums[i] + nums[j] + nums[k]
if x < 0:
j += 1
elif x > 0:
k -= 1
else:
ans.append([nums[i], nums[j], nums[k]])
while j < k and nums[j] == nums[j + 1]: # Skip duplicates
j += 1
while j < k and nums[k] == nums[k - 1]: # Skip duplicates
k -= 1
j += 1
k -= 1
return ans
The code in other languages (Java, C++, Go, TypeScript, Rust, JavaScript, C#, Ruby, PHP) follows the same algorithmic approach, just with different syntax and data structures. The core logic of sorting, iterating, using two pointers, and handling duplicates remains the same.